Gun Report

Ruger KMini-14/5 223 Rem.

Read Gun Tests Rating and Recommendation

Certainly this is a proven design, but in our test, this was the first gun to have a function failure, though that failure was mild compared to the C15 Sporter’s. But this gun also kicked the hardest, we thought, and we didn’t like the buttplate at all.

Ruger KMini-14/5 223 Rem.

Gun Details

Manufacturer
Model Name
Model Number
Home Defense
Recreational
Price
Caliber/Gauge
Caliber Plus Cartridge
Capacity
Weight Unloaded
Warranty
Length of Pull
Action Type
Action Finish
Barrel Finish
Sights
Trigger Pull Weight

Take the safety off the rest of Gun-Tests.com now, free!

Get complete access to this firearms comparison, and weekly members-only newsletters.

That's just the beginning of your free exclusive benefits.

You're only one click away.


Log In

Forgot your password? Click Here.

Already subscribe but haven't registered for all the benefits of the website? Click here.

The Ruger felt handy, particularly without a scope, and it was a solid and attractive little rifle. The stock had a short 12.7-inch length of pull, and it weighed 7.25 pounds. The trigger pull on the Ruger was excellent, breaking at 2.7 pounds.
The Ruger’s hardwood stock lacked checkering, and we didn’t like the metal buttplate. Also, we didn’t that the stock near the buttplate was squared off.
The black ghost ring rear sight offered a great sight picture, contrasting well with the tall stainless front blade shown at right. It lacked protective ears found on the other guns’ sights, which made the sight picture cleaner and easier to read. The worst sight was found on the Arsenal gun, we thought.

Read Gun Tests Rating and Recommendation