On the Mark V: Mag Box Floats
I enjoyed your article on our rifles in your April issue. I'm always interested in other people's views on our products. I'd like to clear up a technical issue. You mentioned the magazine box in the MkV moved in the stock when the floorplate was open. That is by design. In most bolt-action rifles, the magazine feed lips are built into the receiver, so there will be different receivers within the same model line to handle different-size cartridges. The magazine box is just a box holding the cartridges, and its relationship to the receiver is not critical. Our Vanguard model is a good example of this design. In the MkV, we use the same receiver for all our rifles, no matter the cartridge size.
B&C Records: Whitetail, Sheep, Grizzly Entries on the Rise
NSSF Updates Firearms Retailer Survey Results
CCRKBA: Data Conflicts with Gun Control Rhetoric
Downrange: May 2013
It would be funny, if it weren't so pathetic. The overlords who seek to disarm us just don't know anything about guns, which makes them both arrogant and dangerous. Three recent eyebrow-raising examples.
Credit Where Credit is Due
We tip our hat to Reader Pipken, who suggested we compare high-cost Weatherbys to ‘Wal-mart' Weatherbys. Also, Reader Gray scratches his own Mosquito bite. And praise for the Rhino.
NSSF Statement on Passage of Connecticut Legislation
Set up Your Scope for Success
Rifle Sight-in Process, With Two Tips Most Shooters Will Never Do
Lengthening Chambers and Forcing Cones
There are many reasons for the shotgun ‘smith to lengthen these internal dimensions. Here's how to accomplish the tasks.
Handgun Value Previews: 380s and 357s from Beretta, CZ, Colt, and S&W
Downrange: April 2013
The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that there is no Second Amendment right to carry a concealed firearm in public. The broad wording of the decision in Peterson v. Martinez creates a far-reaching national precedent against carrying a loaded handgun outside the home. The case began on a challenge by a Washington State man against Colorado's law to issue CHL permits only to state residents. But the final ruling held, "In light of our nation's extensive practice of restricting citizens' freedom to carry firearms in a concealed manner, we hold that this activity does not fall within the scope of the Second Amendment's protections." The federal court also rejected arguments that Colorado's CHL law infringed on the Equal Protection Clause and the Privileges and Immunities Clause.































