(GunReports.com) — Harvey Berger, a Gun Tests reader who lists his home state as the Peoples Republic of Kalifornia, praised the just-published comparison of 40 S&W ammo in the February 2013 issue. But there’s a “but.” He wrote:
“I’m writing with a compliment and a request. The 40 S&W ammo comparison was superb. While it skipped some of the ammunition I am familiar with, it was overall impartial and detailed. But I don’t shoot 40 S&W. So I didn’t need this info. When can we expect similar tests on 45 ACP, 9mm, and 357 Magnum?Keep up the good work.”
The Gun Tests staff replied with, “Harvey, here’s what we’ve done so far. We’re doublechecking with Bob Campbell to ensure we didn’t leave any out. But various 45s, 9mms, and 357s have already been covered. More are coming, however.”
To read “Frangible Ammunition Testing: We Give Nine Loads a Fair Shot,” subscribers click here
To read “Dangerous-Game 357 Magnums: Cor-Bon, Grizzly Clear Winners,” subscribers click here
To read “Shotgun Defense Choices: We Pick Two Fiocchi Loads,” subscribers click here
To read “9mm +P and Other Powerful Loads: Black Hills Is a Best Buy,” subscribers click here
To read “38 Specials for Snubbie Carry: We Test Eleven Head to Head,” subscribers click here
To read “A Hard Look at 9mm Luger Loadings: Speer, Fiocchi Win,” subscribers click here
To read “Personal Defense 45 Colt Loads: Some Are Sedate, Others Sizzle,” subscribers click here
To read “High-Velocity 45 ACP Loads: Impressive, But Hard to Handle,” subscribers click here
