Blackhawk Doesn’t Deserve an A-

Reader Charlie thinks we went too easy on the Ruger single-action revolver. Reader Marc has enjoyed his "Lula" loaders for many years. And Reader Bob points out a sighting mistake on the 632.

0

Re: “Convertible Six-Shooters from Taylor’s & Co. and Ruger,”

June-July 2026

I think the Ruger Blackhawk Convertible does not deserve the break, the A- grade, your reviewer gave it. I bought mine — my third Blackhawk — 30 years after Ruger introduced this revolver. That should have been time enough for the company to correct this revolver’s poor handling of 9mm cartridges. I had great hope for a plinking revolver that would fire affordable ammunition, would not just drill through cans or plastic bottles as 22 LRs do, and would not leave lead in my barrel. I bought Hogue hardwood grips. Migration (bullet jump) repeatedly jammed a single-action revolver and drove me nuts. And don’t blame the customer/shooter/victim/sucker. Until Ruger corrects this, no one should buy this gun. I reluctantly sold it to a friend. I think he stuck to rimmed cartridges. I’m so forgiving that I subsequently bought Ruger’s PPSh-41 look-alike carbine and an SP101 in 9mm.

To continue reading this article or issue you must be a paid subscriber. Sign in

Acess the latest Gun Reviews and Data Today.

Get the next year of Gun Tests for just $24. And access all of our online content - over 6,000 articles, reviews, data and more - free of charge.
Subscribe today and save 38%. It's like getting 5 issues FREE!
Already Subscribed?
Click Here to Sign In | Forgot your password? | Activate Web Access